[Orientation] - Refactoring de orientation-form-view

• Contexte
• Objectif

Contexte

Plusieurs bugs trouvés :

• in baseSkills, previous button skips the filters
  Screencast_from_14-08-2024_15_54_40

• Structure orientator should be "valid" when coming from prev button
  

• When coming from carto, and booking an appointment for baseSkills, we shouldn't be able to select the structure within carto
  Screencast_from_14-08-2024_15_57_31

• When coming from registry, the structure info aren't showed in orientation recap
  

• When in onlineMediation, after the creation of the appointment, we still need to confirm the exit modale
  

• When selecting a list of structures, in the carto, if we select some structures, then Precédent / Suivant, the structures aren't selected anymore, but we can go to the next page
  

Objectif

L'orientation est un mess, en profiter pour faire un refacto

• Reorganized orientation.enums (Common + Tunneling are splitted)
• All orientation needs now have filterForms
• Removed base-skills-choice
• Update currentStep before checking if pages need to be skipped, more understandable

changed milestone to %[Rés'in] - v3.2.0 Petites issues disparates

added Status: Ready label

assigned to @pecarlat

created branch fix/orientation/wrong-goPrev to address this issue

mentioned in merge request !888 (merged)

added Status: In Dev label and removed Status: Ready label

changed title from [Orientation] - Bouton précédent renvoie au mauvais parcours to [Orientation] - Refactoring de orientation-form-view

changed the description

changed the description

marked the checklist item When in onlineMediation, after the creation of the appointment, we still need to confirm the exit modale as completed

marked the checklist item When coming from registry, the structure info aren't showed in orientation recap as completed

added Status: In Review label and removed Status: In Dev label

changed the description

added Status: In QA label and removed Status: In Review label

assigned to @eleluron and unassigned @pecarlat

@eleluron Celle-ci est plutôt tech ; ça corrige plusieurs bugs de l'orientation + simplifie le code pour nous. Je ne sais pas si tu veux la QA, mais tu peux dans tous les cas te noter qu'il faudra faire une recette minutieuse de l'orientation à la prochaine mise en prod. Merci !

closed